Stud's art dates from around 1980, a time when fetish
publishing in the UK was testing the boundaries of new-found
'liberation' from censorship. In a way, though, it seems to look back
to the 50's/60's and the traditional, leather biker in this first
image illustrates this. This is not the civilised, leather gentry of
Tom of Finland's work but a fearsome Hell's Angel, whose unkempt
hair, oversized boots and lewd clothing suggest a rough and
lascivious character. In startling contrast, the victim awaiting his
due seems quite normal, an average guy with an attractive face,
coiffured blond hair and trim physique. Only the generously-sized
nipple rings give a clue that he's a signed up member, but you sense
a chasm of character and lifestyles between them (class if you like)
that seems very English. The drawing of the biker is a little stiff
(it's the iconography that creates his menace) but for my money the
rendering of the bound captive is exceptionally good.
The second drawing of a water-sports scene has a
curiously naïve feel, the tough guy arches awkwardly (almost
protectively!) over his captive to make a pissy connection. It's as
though space has run out at the top of the picture and he's being
squeezed in. The whip and other symbols of butchness (tattoo, stubble
etc) are somewhat undermined by this boyish awkwardness and also his
rather cute face with it's luxuriant eyelashes. The technique is
sketchy but the shading technique is actually quite sophisticated.
Overall, the picture seems charmingly naïve and if you have seen
Thomas Waugh's collections of early gay art you'll probably remember
seeing other pictures drawn in this way.
This dungeon scene also has a retro feel, recalling
times when pseudo-historical settings were regularly used to provide
'cover' for S&M imagery. The detailed texturing of the background
(including disturbing streaks on the walls) greatly enhances the
brooding atmosphere. Stud had a fondness for hoods on both prisoners
and torturers and he's also gone to town with the chain restraints
here. The unadorned prisoner, hanging around in the background,
awaiting his turn, makes a nice contrast and reminds us that the
leather gear is here is not mere costumery, selected by the wearer,
but an intimidating part of the ritual. You have to search a bit to
discover the exact nature of the ordeal Stud is portraying, the hot
clue is nearly out of the picture. I can't tell if this is artistic
discretion or more of the clumsy 3rd party cropping you
can see at the top. This picture appears to have been shaded with
washes, suggesting the original was coloured but I've yet to see a
coloured Stud picture, low circulation magazines at that time were
predominantly black and white.
Stud's approach to S&M is pretty uncompromising, so
his version of 'riding the wedge' replaces the usual chamfered,
wooden beam with a fearsome sharp blade. (click on the label below for more examples). The prisoner,
sympathetically portrayed once again as an average, young man, dangles
above, clinging on by his fingertips to delay the inevitable ride
down the sloping blade. The whole scene is lit by an 'authentic'
flaming brand. Meanwhile the torturer and inquisitors look on with
emotions concealed behind ceremonial hoods which have all sorts of
unpleasant, historical associations. There's a kinship here with the
strange dungeon imagery of Les Farnak.
The final picture seems to me to epitomise Stud's art.
At first it is mildly shocking. The activities in progress -
piercing, waxing, hair burning etc - are really not so terrible as
fetish goes, but Stud suggests there is far worse to come. However, it is his
characterisation of the bound victim that gives the picture it's edge. With slender body and luxuriant
blond hair he seems to epitomise a healthy, carefree, 'normal' youth whose
presence here seems quite out of place, although he is clearly
aroused by the attention. The torturers suppress his cries and go
about their work (corrupting the innocent? punishing the privileged?)
with grim, merciless smiles.
Stud's art seems to make a point of placing ordinary men
at the mercy of dark and evil captors who revel in their power over
the seemingly innocent (or uninitiated perhaps) victim. Despite the
limitations of his drawing technique, it's a very powerful, angry
message. I have hinted that Stud may have belonged to the 1950's
generation, a seriously oppressive time for gays in the UK and these
pictures, coming as they do at the dawn of modern liberation may
represent something of a primal scream at the injustice of it all.
These days he is something of a cult figure and we can just enjoy his pictures for their raw erotic power.
I haven't found any site for
Stud, his porny name makes searching pretty hard. He may be
represented at gay museum sites but I can only suggest the GMBA
archive (current link in sidebar).
For
earlier articles in this series, click on the A-Z label below
or
search by name in the masthead box.