To my readers......

SITE UPDATE NOTICE

Thanks for visiting mitchmen, home of Mitchell's Gay Art

For Artwork by Mitchell click on the 'Mitchell's Gallery Hub' tab just below
The Caps and Collars/ Flat Cap Gang story at Google Groups is presently paused. (see Group News for link)

Link to the Royale Studio Archive in the right sidebar


Message updated 26th Jun 2025
Showing posts with label vintage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vintage. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 March 2026

Real Men Do Wear Pouches

Brian Lamprill, in pouch, by Vic White
 
 
 I recently published a post at the mitchmen Royale Studio Gallery about the hunky Royale model Brian Lamprill. It featured photographs of him taken by a different, British photographer, Vic White. 
 
Vic White was a respected British body-builder in the 50s, so his choice of models and photography of them was based on a true appreciation of the artistic and physical qualities of a well-developed, male physique. 
 
What surprised me about the Lamprill portfolio though, was the sheer sexiness that emanated from it, not just from the model's face, bulk and oily curves, but from the frankly startling shaping of his posing pouch. (which may have got a bit oily, accidentally). It's very revealing that both the photographer and model were clearly comfortable with this.
 
These pictures were published in the British, beefcake magazine 'Man Alive' in 1960. Openly published I nearly said, but it was hard to get hold of copies, except by mail order subscription. Nevertheless, it seems remarkable in those oppressed times. It sparked an (admittedly prurient!) interest in me about this photographer, which revived when I came across the picture below in my files.
 
 
Ray Andrews by Vic White

I freely admit that this model is my 'type', not pretty but he has an innate 'maleness'. 
As with the image of Lamprill above, that quality emerges more strongly if you subtract the slightly camp, bodybuilder/ballet legs....
 
Ray Andrews by Vic White

 Ray's pouch is more discreetly arranged than Brian's, but you still get the picture. This much derided garment is capable of as much erotic impact as the most slick and skimpy of modern thongs. Its improvisatory appearance is itself part of the appeal, particularly on a man who looks far from being the sort who would be comfortable showing himself and being photographed in such unusual and revealing kit. 
 
After all, this is an era when men's underwear actually fitted around the waist, above the hips and hiding the navel. 
 
Prehistoric Men's Underwear ad
(a time when tents and men's briefs were carefully segregated
and you had to take pills for blue finger)
 
60's underpants also entirely covered the backside, whereas the pouch is completely backless. In these circumstances, Ray's confident looking pose is commendable. This man inspired my title for this post - Real Men Do Wear Pouches. 
 
 
Derek Manthorpe by Vic White

 This photo has similar qualities, a man with pleasant, but unremarkable facial features. You might imagine him working in an office. But he's unexpectedly showing an incredibly bulky torso and an incongruous pouch that seems weighed down by its contents. His expression seems to convey manly bewilderment at being asked to wear such a thing and having to hold his hands behind his back, (as if they were tied together) to leave the embarrassing, brazen display (and imaginary access to it by any viewer) entirely unrestricted. 
 
White has arranged Derek's pouch to be narrower than Ray's (pushing together the top hem, which slides freely on the support string like a simple curtain). His pouch sides drop vertically, creating the impression of weightiness (and, for the wearer, increasing the sense of brevity and openness at the sides). There's possibly (probably) been some sanitising of the pouch surface, but the w-shaped shadow/stain at its base is reassuringly shapely, crying out to be cradled, like billiard balls in a bag. White himself has cropped off the lower half of the picture but stopped just short of the pouch and that draws attention to it.
 
 
Ken Restall by Vic White


Ken Restall was another mature-looking man who looked an improbable choice for a model, but you can't argue with that physique! 
 
White has employed the same crotch-level, cropping device here and created a strange shadow underneath, which gives an impression of exceptional bulk in the pouch without showing any sensitive detail. It's set very low down on Ken's shaved abdomen, but the strings at the side suggest it should be even lower. It looks like unfinished adjustments.
 
Ken's finely chiselled torso is well worthy of the unrestricted display afforded by the hands above the head pose, but rather than opting for conventional bicep flexing arm he's chosen a hands-clasping position that gives the faint impression of him being tied.
 
 
Mike Tozer by Vic White

 Mike Tozer was something of a catch for White, well muscled with a photogenic personality. White snapped him in a traditional muscle pose here, but again with the pouch slung very low on a shaved abdomen. It looks like his pubic hair has been painted out just above the pouch. The photo is cropped slightly lower down the legs than those above, which brings out his impressively-sized thighs but seems to miniaturise the pouch.  
 
The pouch itself is at the opposite extreme to those just above - loose fitting, apparently, with an indentation that suggests thick material, which certainly hasn't been wetted. Perhaps Mike brought his own. Some of that linen crispness is attributable to the extreme AI adjustments I've resorted to, in order to create a brighter, sharper image, but the pouch looks just the same in the noisy original.
 
 It's not very flattering to a man, appearing to have very little to show seems worse than showing everything. However, spots like this, dark in the middle with a bright halo, often appear on old photographs, so I've experimented with a version treating this as noise.
 
Mike Tozer by Vic White (pouch modified)

This modified version is more like what you'd expect and credits Mike with a manly presence.  
 
Ray Golding by Vic White

White's manipulations with pouches seem to have reached a crescendo with this image. It's not obviously faked. How did he persuade the model to get into this? More to the point, I suppose, how did he persuade the conservative magazine, Man's World, to publish this in February 1959, well before the dawn of the permissive 60s? 
 
Ray Golding has the pop-star looks of that era and a physique that looks trim rather than well-muscled. Not White's usual material.
 
 
Ray Golding by Vic White
 
I don't know if Ray Golding is related to Roy, it's from late 1958 (Man Alive, issue 2) so it's conceivably the same person, but this image of him is worth including in its own right. He's got more oil on his body that he's got on his hair but its has a magical effect on his youthful physique. 
 
He gives the impression of a frustrated, young man who has just been told he can't borrow Dad's car. Or punished by having to wear a skimpy pouch, in my twisted imagination!  
 
His right arm is semi-flexed, like a bodybuilder pose, but it's placed on the far side so as not to interfere with the line of his body that flows down to the pouch nestling between his thighs. The pouch itself is clean and natural-looking with intriguing, if faint, contours and a teasing opening at the side.
 
 
Doug Preddy by Vic White

Another tribute to youth from around the same time (Aug 58). Doug strikes a 'thinker' pose, 
similar to Ray's, but more philosophical and classical. Doug's muscle credentials demonstrate a good deal of time spent in the gym, with the photo capturing splendid arm details. 
 
His raised leg ensures a clear pouch outline with bulkiness and ambiguous shaping that seems more suggestive than genuine. Sorry Doug! The indrawn ab just above compensates, seemingly inviting exploration and delving.

More on Vic White to come

Tuesday, 11 November 2025

Stephen's 'Golden Pasha'

 Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' dates from the nineteen sixties. It appears to be related in concept to, and a precursor to, the better known 'Sailors Beware' story, which came out in its first version shortly after 'Pasha', judging by the Kris Catalogue numbering. 

Stephen's 'Golden Pasha', Original Catalogue images
(rearranged from a vertical strip)

The Kris Catalogue entry for 'Pasha' (replicated above) showed 6 images, with all the characters in them respectably 'draped'. Three of them were also published in a larger format in a different catalogue. This article features an uncensored version which I found on the Tim In Vermont website before it was taken down. It didn't give any source information. 

 The three 'big' earlier images are included in the article below in the appropriate places. Unlike the revised version of 'Sailor Beware', the underlying images don't seem to have been significantly altered other than replacing the loin-cloths and pouches with not quite erect organs. No sex is shown.  

 

Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 1
 
The Golden Pasha lounges in luxury while around him a harem of conspicuously naked, young men entertain him with music, grovel and pamper him. Notice the phallic uprights of his throne.
 
Stephen was quite fond of depicting musicians at this time. I suppose there's a certain innuendo in the horn blowing and string plucking of long-necked instruments.
 
 
Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 1 (original version)

This earlier version shows all the characters in exactly the same positions. The three on the right have acquired pouches which seem to be carefully detailed with patterns (and jewels in the Pasha's case). The covering of the guard at the doorway, however, seems to have been painted on rather clumsily by comparison. The Pasha's pantaloons have also been altered, extending all the way up to his waist rather than finishing high up on the thigh, like stockings. 
 
Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 2
 
The Pasha seems to be a hard master to serve. In the dungeon below, those who displease him are chained up, and he personally punishes each of them with his whip. His suspender belt is meticulously detailed and impressively jewelled. It's apparent that the 'Golden' tag relates to his wealth, not his sunny personality.
 
 
Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 3

The Pasha's maltreatment of his slaves means he must watch them with an eagle eye for any signs of rebellion. But one slave at least has had enough. He has somehow procured a sleeping potion and secretly drugs the Pasha's wine. 

This picture almost seems to shift the scene to Japan, as witness the bonsai-like trees. The intricate decoration of the pillar on the left which includes a Fuji-like mountain, a stylised chrysanthemum and more typically Japanese style patterns in-between (plus an incongruous elephant, which is neither Arabian nor Japanese).

Some of Steve Masters' images around this time featured decorative detail like this. 

 

Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 3 (original version)

This earlier version is little different. Again, the Pasha's pants have become thigh-wraps and his dick is covered by a jock-like, ribbed pouch (with a jewel encrusted top hem!). We can see more of the foreground, bottom left, which turns out to be a pool with fish and lilies. A show of his opulence.

 

Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 4

Once the Pasha has fallen into a drugged sleep, his slaves rise up against him. Some have weapons, perhaps taken from the Palace Guards who seem to have deserted their master. Someone, at some point, has removed his pants and boots. As a result, the Pasha lies in a tempting, splayed legs position*. One of the rebels seems to be inviting everyone to have a go. 

*This is a favourite pose of Stephen's, it seems to turn up in many stories, twice in Night Patrol, in image 5 and image 8. The Pasha version is more convincing than some.

Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 5

The Pasha awakes to find a knife menacing his chest and his treasure chest being looted. Perhaps more startlingly for him, his legs are in physical contact with the intimate regions of two of his slaves. One is resting between the buns of the looter. The other is raised between the legs of his immediate attacker, almost as if they had just had intercourse. Who knows? The threat of the knife seems to be equated with the threat of his dick. A choice to be made?

 

Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 5 (original)

In the original version of image 5, pouches have sprouted once again, to conceal the less offensive weapons of the attackers.  The disappearance of the primary attacker's dick makes his knife seem a lot more menacing, although he's still deliberately angling it out from his groin. 

 The Pasha's modesty is protected by a casually draped cloth, looking a bit like leopard skin. Oddly enough, that device makes his nudity and vulnerability seem more apparent. His hairy legs, glimpsed in earlier pictures, come to the fore.

 All the slaves' faces have been upgraded in the nude version, in line with Stephen's later technique. In the original, we can see more of the architectural detail of the room, which adds greatly to the depth of the image. We can also see some subtle shading in the trees, which is probably washed out in the later version by the reproduction process.

Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 6

In the final image, the Pasha himself is chained like a slave and forced to kneel, cringing in submission to his former slaves. He is stripped of his turban, the symbol of his rank, as well as the last vestiges of his clothing (except for one sock). He looks very naked now, and the raised position of his hands, behind his back, suggests he's desperately trying to free himself. Aware perhaps that he will soon make his first acquaintance with the business end of his own, vengeful whip in the dungeon. 
 
This is an interesting study of feet, which are less evident in the earlier pictures, but soon became Stephen's unique trademark. Perhaps the Pasha is being invited to address them with respectful lips. Their exaggerated size here creates a sense of powerful men and menace surrounding the cowed ruler. 
 
The intertwining of the feet with Stephen's signature seems to be deliberate, but it's unclear why, perhaps indicative of his personal fascination with them. I'm afraid it reminds me of sticky carpets in sleazy bars!
 
Stephen's 'Golden Pasha' 6 (original)

This cropped version comes from Drummer in 1976. It's interesting that that particular publication should decide to crop out the whip. It makes the Pasha seem cornered, rather than surrounded. Interesting too, that Drummer don't seem to have had the nude version at their disposal (unless, of course, they preferred the contrast and subtle power of nude vs clothed, i.e. CMNM). Either way, it's a tribute to the essence of domination in Stephen's drawing of this scene.
 
 
The Golden Pasha doesn't quite have the power of other Etienne stories. The draughtmanship is good quality, the sexuality subdued, but bubbling teasingly beneath the surface and between the frames. The Pasha's relationship with his harem/slaves seems to be strictly sadistic. It's they who seem to threaten him with sex as a punishment and humiliation. The simple morality of the story is a far cry from the aggressive sexual subjugations of Night Patrol, Marine Training and Here Comes the Groom to name just a few of Stephen's later creations. 
 
Perhaps that reflects the political changes of the 60s and the greater freedom of expression subsequently afforded to gay men. 
  
 ~
 
There are numerous other posts about Etienne here at mitchmen,
check out my Etienne index for articles mainly about him,
a general search on Etienne will bring up every reference.
 
There's also an 'Exclusively Etienne' Google Group 
that's easy to join.   


Tuesday, 1 October 2024

Tribute to Stan of Sweden - 2

One of the great fetish fads of the sixties was for putting muscle men in skimpy, tight, white, gym shorts. Scott of London was a memorably, sexy exponent of the genre whilst Royale Studio had a claim to be pioneers of the trend with storyettes like 'The Football Ballet' in 1957 and a number of stunning 'Sporting Hunks


Bo Johansson by Stan of Sweden

Stan was late joining this party but this contribution to the genre was typically stylish and restrained.
 Bo Johansson is seen here in a different, far from boyish light. In this rear view his shorts look satisfyingly snug, but not unnaturally tight. Their neat new appearance makes an attractive package. The subtly notched leg hem is a true connoisseur's touch.


Patrick Berglund by Stan of Sweden

Patrick Bergland's handsome, classical body-builder pose contrasts with well-worn gym shorts which hint at the hard work needed to produce such a stunning physique and the earthy qualities of the man within. The low waist, slung below the hips, halfway to his groin, trades in practicality for something sexier. The tucked-up legs accentuate the models thigh's and create radiating crease lines outlining his balls, lifted and divided by the centre seam. A surprisingly daring image for Stan.


Hartell Jukka by Stan of Sweden

 The turned-down waist and tucked in legs of this model's shorts create briefer proportions that leave no doubt about the erotic intent. Typically, Stan captures a nervous glance to one side, as if he is embarrassed to be seen making such a daring display of himself. His relatively ordinary, slightly boyish face somehow makes it seem out of character. He leans back against a reassuring pillar in contrived nonchalance, perhaps not realising quite how much his groin is pushed forwards.

Stan has shaped the model's tackle here more in the style of Scott, it's prominent but less explicit in shape (at first sight). The tight centre seam has been pulled right up into the model's groin pushing the dangling assembly to one side where the shadowed outline of his cock can be made out, curving down in front of his balls.


Sture by Stan of Sweden

Stan has also cajoled this model into a forward-thrusting pose, with hands clasped behind leaving no hiding place, not even a prop to hang on to. There's an endearing look of uncertainty in his face, a nervous smile struggling to overcome his embarrassment and the loneliness of standing naked and provocative before the camera. 

His shorts look as if they might be the same ones Bo Johansson was wearing in the first picture. The cut is already brief enough to discomfort any man accustomed to pants that hang from his waist (as was the norm back then). They are pulled high at the sides, defensively, but the waistline still dips low enough to expose a sizeable tuft of pubic hair. The bulk of the model's tackle is even more anonymous here, but the bulging shapes either side of the centre seam and straining crease lines indicate a substantial presence. A curious haze hints at even naughtier details higher up, deemed not fit for publication.  


Billy by Stan of Sweden

Stan has used the same formula here although Billy's incredible 'cut' musculature makes an extremely effective distraction from matters of sensuality. His facial expression can best be described as wary and challenging, confident of his own attractiveness, but less sure about what the photographer is doing with it. 

This image departs from the white, gym shorts formula, reflecting instead the emergence of bolder male fashions in the sixties which even reached into men's swimwear. Mmmm. These belted shorts emphasised the new, daring low waisted style, offering manly reassurance of protection from marauders and support in an emergency.

The forward thrust of the model here seems much more confident, so Stan's fiddling down below comes as something of a surprise. The tucked-up legs don't quite quite fit the glamourous, aloof aura and the massive frontal bulge seems at variance with the impression of boyish innocence. It invokes feelings of doubt and scepticism battling with optimistic desire in the viewer. A bit too perfect perhaps.


Lennart Svensson by Stan of Sweden


Stan picks up another theme of the 50's/60's, taking a leaf out of John Barrington's book with this image of Lennart Svensson wading in the sea in his jeans. It's probably chilly Baltic waters, hence the model's discomforted look, but the scenario is an admiring echo of Barrington's studies of the young men of the Cote d'Azure, like his images of Yves Grangeat, shot for Royale Studio

Saturday, 28 September 2024

Tribute to Stan of Sweden - 1

The photographs of Stan of Sweden enjoyed a brief vogue during the flowering of beefcake mags in the 1960's. Like Basil Clavering of Royale Studio, he made much use of everyday clothing which gave his muscular models a sense of place in the everyday world instead of isolating them in some unreachable place reserved for the Gods of Physique. Today he seems largely forgotten, this article pays tribute to his stunning male art.

Bo Johansson by Stan of Sweden

Bo Johansson was one of Stan's most popular models.
Boyish looks, but a stunning bodybuilder's physique.
The cap may have gone out of fashion but not the muscles.


Bo Johansson by Stan of Sweden

Bo's quizzical expression here is priceless.
It makes him look like an innocent young man, up from the country,
uncomfortable at being asked to strike the artificial, body-builder pose.


Hans Brown by Stan of Sweden


 Hans Brown looks away, also as though embarrassed about his muscles being on display.
Perhaps not realising how his rebellious, thumbs-in-pockets pose and indrawn abs
 increases the erotic effect.

These pale jeans were a hallmark of Stan's work, they add a casual, improvised air. 
The loose fit on this model suggest they are not the his own attire.


Kent Strom by Stan of Sweden

In this image the dipping waistline and dramatic lighting became something of a classic.
The open pose (another body-builder standard) seems like an invitation from the darkness.
Stan did not shy away from a hairy torso but made a feature of it. 
The side-ties on the model's trunks are dated but still sexy, just one tug!


Hans Inge by Stan of Sweden

Stan didn't use posing pouches (as far as I know) but did get some of his models naked.
Here again the arty lighting deliberately accentuates the hairy regions,
including the lower abdomen, which was daring for it's time.


Kurt Peters by Stan of Sweden

Stan did not restrict himself to body-builders.
This model has a more 'natural' build, though not lacking a pleasing shape.
His older face, hairiness and seaman's tattoos suggest ruggedness and experience.
The clean look of his jeans, though drawn tight, seems reassuringly respectable*.
One of my personal favourites

(*But we should remember that in the 1960's, jeans were far from universal wear, their tight sexiness was solely the province of the rebellious young. The white or pale blue variants did not accentuate wear and sexy creases like the indigo ones did, but were regarded as daring and very showy in a way that was rather disreputable for a man)


Niels Anton by Stan of Sweden

This looks like a tough, working man too, although he's more muscularly built.
The ice hook adds an overt edge, which is unusual in Stan's work. 
The pale jeans have been swapped for a corduroy pair (alluringly tactile in their day). 
The tight fit suggests they might be the model's own clothes.
The waistline abruptly interrupts the line of the model's torso, bluntly obscuring his nakedness. 
But the cut-off across the line of his abs is teasing, with a hint of pubic hair escaping.
Lower down, the opening of his crotch is clearly visible below a modest bulge.


Niels Anton by Stan of Sweden

In this image the naked torso seems a more natural complement to the jeans.
They showcase his manly, broad-shouldered physique. 
His slightly youthful face with aspirational 'tache-let and knowingly coiffured hair
is a marvellous portrait of emerging manhood.
However, his open crotch, the shape of the hook and the way he is holding it 
creates a electric erotic undercurrent which is hard to define but unmistakeable.
Notice the hair showing under his arm-pit.

Sivert Olsen by Stan of Sweden

The frightened expression of this young bodybuilder performing a side pose under harsh lighting makes a thought-provoking complement to Niels Anton's scary hook above. Stan had a talent for capturing the uncertainty of young men.

Stan took many conventional images of body-builders posing in competitions, which is no doubt how he won their confidence and was able to persuade them to pose 'out of their trunks' for more interesting imagery. There's an impression here that Sivert is in the process of loosening his side-ties and about to take his trunks off, but Stan usually wanted these muscular models to put clothes on for his photos.

Bo Johansson by Stan of Sweden

In this image Stan catches Bo Johansson in a pose that is the epitome of awkward, uncertainty.
The model seems to be pouting in irritation and frustration,
but he's unwittingly showing his obedience to Stan's wishes.
This isn't a body-builder's pose, there's a hint of captivity about it.

Sven Eric by Stan of Sweden.

Stan seems to have a trick for drawing out the hairiness of a man's body, an oil or water spray perhaps. 
Maybe that is responsible for Sven Erick's expression of saintly patience and forbearance here.
Coupled with the oversize jeans, it creates an impression of him being manipulated and controlled.
That is the true reality, but the gay viewer can vicariously enjoy the illusion of submissivness.


Tord Eric by Sven of Sweden

Stan's male imagery is sexily unique in many ways, but he joins the beefcake mainstream 
with this image of Tord Eric in a US Navy cap, AMG-style.
However the sweeping dip of the model's trunks creates a stronger image than a pouch would.
The original image may have given a better idea of it's contents!

In Part 2, I look at his images which echo themes from other photographers.

Monday, 8 July 2024

James Seely Naked

In this series of articles featuring James Seely (see foot of post), I've posted numerous images of him in which he is genuinely naked (despite the restrictions of the 1960's) , but none of them are frontal nudes, which were considered to be indecent. The 'shower post' illustrated how clumsy and contrived some of the cover-ups were to comply with this ban. 



This picture of James Seely totally nude is attributed to Denny Denfield by Tim in Vermont. Apparently he photographed models as a hobby but did not sell the pictures. He lived in San Francisco and knew Bob Mizer which is perhaps how he came into contact with James. However, I confess I know very little else about him or any other images of James taken by him.


1

Looking at this image of James today it's hard to comprehend what all the fuss was about. It shows a beautiful physique and although he looks very attractive 'out of pouch' it barely qualifies as erotic. Very close to the ideal of ancient Greek statues. I suppose the oily sheen on his physique might be thought dubious, but it was then, and still is, a standard device used by body builders to highlight their muscle development to contest judges. 

Later on, in the 70's, Mike Arlen would anoint his model's cocks with oil as well as their bodies
and produced spectacularly sexy results never seen before.


2

This photographer has taken pains to ensure that Seely does not look aroused, which would have made the picture not just indecent, but pornographic. Similarly James' facial expression, which is often entertainingly animated in other images, is sober and serious here allowing a claim to be made that the image is purely artistic (which is what the column is there for of course).

It's not surprising to discover that, faced with a naked model, photographers took frontal nude shots of them (which was not of itself illegal). However, the photos could not legally be sold or sent through the postal system. Photographers had to resort to coded advertisements and catalogues and post the pictures to buyers in plain envelopes, hoping that the postal authorities would not intercept them. Unfortunately, photographs require stiffened envelopes and were quite often spotted, inspected and the contents confiscated. It's clear though that much of the material did get through, the Post Office couldn't open every envelope and no doubt there were plenty of postal workers who ignored them.


3

Here James poses with another lusciously muscled man who I have not yet identified (info welcome)

Any gay man would see the eroticism simmering in this coupling, but the photographer has pre-empted accusations of smut by placing the models either side of the same pseudo-classical column seen in 1 above. It's effect is rather like the pillow down the centre of the bed, supposedly used by Hollywood film makers to legitimise putting movie stars in bed together. 

Nevertheless, the models' hands are tantalisingly close together on top of the column, and the fingers of James' partner (both hands) look as if they are itching to get up to mischief. In fact, you might have taken the model's facial expressions to indicate that they just have. Fortunately all is calm down below. 

Purveyors of nude images presumably took precautions to prevent intercepted images being traced back to them and recipients sometimes took elaborate precautions like using Post Office boxes and Post Restante to prevent their addresses being discovered by the authorities on envelopes and mailing lists (and also to hide the material from their wives and other people they lived with). Police in the UK went out of their way to expose gay men to their relatives and employers, ruining many lives. Not all gay men lived in fear though, if you lived your life openly the risk of fines was worth running.  
 

4

 With the models down on one knee the separating effect of the column is increased, allowing the models to face each other, but not look at each other. To the knowing eye, though, the phallic connotations of the column itself are clear enough.


5

In this image, a low, tin box has replaced the column but the raised knees of the models continue to shield their nether regions from each other. However, they also open up their stances and it almost seems like there is a 'musical chairs' style race to clamber on top of the box. Both men seem to be struggling to keep a straight face

~

Apart from Denfield, James Seely only seems to have posed for Kris of Chicago and Bob Mizer and I believe the photographer who took these black and white images was Kris. Kris didn't go in for Greek Columns very much but a very similar object can be seen in the catalogue page shown below (in No 7). A drum-sized version, painted black, also appears in several of his images.


In addition to this match, the original of one of the nude images above (No 2) has the inscription 'R-27' on it and you can see above that this is how Kris numbered his sets in his catalogue.

~

 The James Seely series: