Leather Sex Appeal - 25

A similar image to No 1 in this series, but this one shows off the model's muscular upper body and - a particular point of interest for me - his neck. The chaps are tighter too which may appease one of my correspondents! There's a surfeit of leather here but the Gauntlets are an original touch.

Mitchell's Leather Pictures - The Mechanic's Locker Secret

Mitchell - The Mechanic's Locker Secret

When the boys caught sight of the kinky gear hidden in another mechanics locker,
they couldn't resist hazing him and making him demonstrate it for them.
Of course, one thing led to another.......

The Path of Pain series continues at 'mitchmen' with lots of leather-inspired pictures. The Leather 'Knights' have embarked on a campaign to collect semen from manly men. You can join for free by clicking the link at the right.

Leather Sex Appeal - 24

I just like this man, the cap suits

Leather Sex Appeal - 23

The egalitarian nature of leather means that elegance is not a mandatory requirement.
Wearing jock on top of shorts must be considered overdressing but the bulging result is undeniably attractive. Big men will always attract attention.

Leather Sex Appeal - 22

The appeal of this unusual lace up jock lies not in its visual appearance on the body but in it's obvious functionality which the model demonstrates for us. His plushly upholstered body is beautifully adorned by the chain dangling from his nipples - serve him right we all say. I also like the pose astride the fence. But it's an odd photo really.

Leather Sex Appeal - 21

The apparently dismayed pose and OTT ironmongery invites humourous captions
(e.g Oh no! I've forgotten my ......)
However the lines of the jock are very sexy and there's a nice sense of bondage in the sparse strapping

Leather Sex Appeal - 20

Sexy but not terribly suave. This is the leatherman's dilemma. The clothing says hard the pose says not - even with a bike. The model (I think it's the formidable Robert Black) has terrific assets on display, so who wouldn't want him? His take on 'less is more' is perhaps a little too calculating.